Wind, Solar, Gas, Storage Eye ‘Resilience’ Market Share
January 15, 2018 - storage organizer
By Rich Heidorn Jr.
FERC’s statute final week that “resilience” is not simply a matter of onsite fuel supply won scarcely concept regard outward a spark and chief industries.
On Tuesday, a bloc of purify appetite advocates and trade groups for a wind, healthy gas, solar and storage industries hold a celebratory press contention where they praised a statute as a win for consumers and a pointer that a new elect — including 3 Republicans allocated by President Trump — will sojourn independent.
“FERC continues to denote that it takes a autonomy unequivocally seriously,” pronounced Todd Foley, comparison clamp boss for process and supervision affairs for a American Council on Renewable Energy.
“The professionalism of a [staff and commissioners] — in looking during a doubt acted by a secretary formed on a record before them and solemnly final a trail brazen — we cruise is encouraging,” resolved Malcolm Woolf, comparison clamp boss of process for Advanced Energy Economy.
But while a bloc found togetherness in hostile Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s cost supports for spark and chief plants, their interests might separate in a new calendar a elect ordered.
FERC destined RTOs and ISOs to answer questions on how they cruise and obtain resilience. The beginning could outcome in record that array renewables, healthy gas and storage opposite any other — as good as chief and spark — in seeking remuneration for their resiliency attributes. (See FERC Rejects DOE Rule, Opens RTO ‘Resilience’ Inquiry.)
Seeking Market Solutions, Fair Competition
FERC done transparent in a statute that it did not determine with Perry’s welcome of onsite fuel storage as a resiliency panacea.
“That’s maybe one element, though it’s positively not a usually element,” Woolf said. “What unequivocally matters is altogether complement trustworthiness and resilience. We saw from a explosve storm of a final week that a chief plant — Pilgrim, differently ideally arguable — was forced to close down since of delivery issues.
“We’re assured [that] as they do this, [FERC] will commend that modernized appetite technologies, including distributed appetite resources, appetite efficiency, direct response, storage, renewables [and] healthy gas … all have a purpose to play in creation a clever complement and that a marketplace needs to value a attributes of all of those opposite technologies.”
Jason Burwen, clamp boss of process for a Energy Storage Association, pronounced during a press contention that his organisation will be examination “whether there will be an event for marketplace mechanisms to be employed such that a full operation of resilience attributes — not usually a singular one like fuel declaration — can be valued and compensated. … Additionally, we demeanour brazen to observant either there will be a contention of a infrastructure member of this — not simply a generator resources or direct resources side of this.”
The California Public Utilities Commission in 2013 ordered the state’s 3 vast investor-owned utilities to supplement 1.3 GW of appetite storage by 2024. The sequence implemented Assembly Bill 2514, in that a legislature systematic buying of storage to revoke investments in new hoary fuel plants, confederate renewables and minimize hothouse emissions.
Dena Wiggins, CEO of a Natural Gas Supply Association, pronounced her organisation was “relieved” by FERC’s decision. “What we were looking for all along was a clever contention that would value a attributes of all of a fuels. All of a fuels … move something to a conversation.”
“It’s not usually valuing those essential trustworthiness services though … creation certain there’s no taste as to who can indeed contest to yield those services,” pronounced Amy Farrell, comparison clamp boss of supervision and open affairs for a American Wind Energy Association. “The marketplace should prerogative a preferred resilience attributes in a resource-neutral manner, with each provider being paid a same cost for providing a same section of service,” she combined afterward.
“I cruise we’re all in aroused agreement,” pronounced Dan Whitten, clamp boss of communications for a Solar Energy Industries Association. “What we wish is a event to compete, and we cruise a FERC preference … presents that opportunity.”
Essential Reliability Services: Who’s in? Who’s out?
The new move systematic by FERC will need a RTOs to uncover how they are receiving what NERC has named “essential trustworthiness services,” including bulk and voltage support, ramping capability, handling pot and reactive power. (See NERC Report Urges Preserving Coal, Nuke ‘Attributes’.)
Last August, a American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) expelled a PA Consulting Group investigate it consecrated that ranked era resources on 11 attributes, giving spark high outlines in all though black start capability. (See Echoing DOE Report, Industry Study Touts Coal ‘Resiliency’.)
The news followed a study done by The Brattle Group for a American Petroleum Institute (API), that resolved that gas-fired era is “relatively advantaged” in all though one of a 12 attributes it identified. (See NG Lobby Goes on Offensive vs Coal, Nukes.)
The subsequent best choice source, according to Brattle, was pumped hydro with 10. Nuclear and coal, a energy beneficiaries of policies bearing normal “baseload” generation, fared distant worse during 5 and 4 respectively, as did breeze (one) and solar (two).
The API-Brattle news ranked spark as “neutral” on dual categories for that ACCCE claimed a full measure — bulk response and ramp rates (referred to as “ramp capability” by ACCCE). API did not measure 3 categories in that ACCCE pronounced spark had an advantage over gas: onsite fuel supply, reduced bearing to a singular indicate of intrusion and cost stability.
AWEA pronounced a API-Brattle commentary are “largely consistent” with those of a Analysis Group in a news a classification commissioned. But a breeze organisation doubtful Brattle’s nomination of breeze as “relatively disadvantaged” in bulk response, observant breeze turbines “can yield bulk response that is an sequence of bulk faster than required appetite plants.”
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) responded that “the Brattle investigate reinforces a end that grid trustworthiness would be hopelessly compromised but chief energy.”
NEI CEO Maria Korsnick pronounced final week that RTOs contingency take “prompt and suggestive action, including on issues such as cost formation.”
“The standing quo, in that markets commend usually short-term cost signals and omit a essential purpose of chief generation, will lead to some-more beforehand shutdowns of well-run chief facilities,” she said.
GHG Emissions and Resilience
Some contend resilience efforts also should cruise a impact of hoary fuel generators’ emissions.
In his concurring opinion final week, new Democratic Commissioner Richard Glick remarkable a “irony that a [Department of Energy’s] due order would intensify a energy and bulk of … impassioned continue events by assisting to hinder a retirement of coal-fired generators, that evacuate poignant quantities of hothouse gases that minister to anthropogenic meridian change.”
Last month, associate Democratic Commissioner Cheryl LaFleur pronounced FERC’s environmental reviews of healthy gas tube applications should cruise “the downstream impacts on hothouse gases.”
None of a 3 Republicans on a elect has publicly indicated they determine with a Democrats’ concerns, however. As a member of a Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Commissioner Robert Powelson was a clever believer of a state’s shale gas development. Commissioner Neil Chatterjee, of Kentucky, is an unapologetic upholder of coal.
“The fact is that we need an electric grid regulatory organisation that prioritizes a fast change from unwashed and dangerous hoary fuels to renewable appetite and appetite efficiency,” Ted Glick (no propinquity to Commissioner Glick), an organizer with a anti-gas organisation Beyond Extreme Energy, pronounced after FERC’s rejecting of a NOPR. “We doubt that FERC can turn such an agency.”
Coal interests are certain to conflict any new FERC manners that speed a erosion of their era marketplace share.
Robert E. Murray, CEO of spark writer Murray Energy, pronounced FERC’s statute was a “bureaucratic cop-out” that unprotected consumers to high costs and use interruptions.
“If it were not for a electricity generated by a nation’s coal-fired and chief appetite plants, we would be experiencing large brownouts and blackouts,” he said, citing appetite prices that appearance during some-more than $500/MWh and healthy gas prices that strike $175/MMBtu during a cold snap in early January. “At slightest 37,000 MW of presumably healthy gas-powered electricity were wholly taken due to a priority for home heating use and a inability of healthy gas to upsurge during cold temperatures.”
Additional news on this topic: